Monday, May 30, 2011

Zen and the Art of Daniel's "Let it Go"




    Since it is May 30, and June fast approaches, I'm beginning to feel rather nostalgic about our infamous topic of the month, "Loudoun County"-- Did we do her justice? What I mean to say is, did we really, fully, and truthfully embrace this theme for all it was worth? I can surely only speak for myself when I say, I think not. Therefore, my last post for the month of Loudoun will be dedicated to the, as some would have it, surrogate prince of the county: Mr. Daniel Paschall himself.
 I'm using the word "dedicated" pretty loosely here, as I'm focusing more on Daniel's lexicon than his actual reputation in Loudoun. Anyone who knows DP, or anyone that reads this blog at least, is aware of his old and trusted adage, "Let it go." When, where, or how this statement came to fruition as a tool in Daniel's repertoire of zen mastery, we'll never know (or, he could just explain it in a comment...). What I am sure of, at this point, is that "let it go" has transformed for me: what once was a goading jibe used to condescendingly taunt the arrogance of others has now become the key to my own self-reflection. Allow me to explain... as I mentioned to Daniel, I started to employ "let it go" on a semi-regular basis to poke fun at myself whenever I was taking things far too seriously (as most of us seem to do). It certainly made me laugh, but also had the ability to inexplicably piss me off. As of late, a certain unmentionable situation has arisen in my personal life that has driven me to the brink of reason; probing me to overreact and self-destruct in ways that would surely ignite a chain reaction and send me into a proverbial tailspin. I came to such a crossroads this past week, and had but a moment to decide left or right, rationality or madness. I mockingly told myself to "let it go," and then something peculiar happened. I said it a second time, and then a third... and a strange sense of enlightenment slowly washed along the tired shores of my addled mind. I broke it down, analyzing each word individually, then pieced it back together realizing the collective "let it go" is more than the sum of its noble parts. So, here is my meager attempt at explaining my twisting train of thought during this instant:

LET: in this scenario, let is being used as a verb and is formally defined as "allowing or permitting." In the context of this mantra, let can mean several things-- something you approve, something you've caused, something you must push yourself to acknowledge, a situation you've only tolerated, or, being able to be still and be present.

IT: Ah, now this one's the kicker. "It" is infinite and expanding. "It" can mean everything or "it" can mean nothing at all. "It" is most closely related to the Buddhist chanting word "Om," which scholars are unable to define, as it is meant to signify that which is utterly indefinable. "It" means something very different to each one of us, and preciously so. "It" is the thing in which we're guarding, clinging to, unable to "let go." "It" can be a material possession; animal, mineral, or rock. "It" can be a long-held desire, a dream, a hope, a futile lusting for something that is being sought out in vain. "It" could be a philosophy, an ideology, a stereotype, a self-produced narrative you consistently choose to limit yourself with. "It" could be those things that embarrass you or make you feel shamed. "It" can be the moment he said no, or the instant she fell out of love. "It" could be your anger, your dissatisfaction, your pain, your self-loathing demons. "It" could be your beginning, middle, or end. "It" could be nothing, and rightly so. There is no correct or incorrect substitution here, as I've learned.

GO: This is the easiest concept to grasp, yet the hardest to employ. After one has done the work of discovering their "let" and their "it," they are then asked, no, begged, to release this baggage into the unending abyss. "Go" symbolizes forgiveness, in essence. It's about forgiving yourself as much as it's about forgiving situations in your life that have led you down the path of frenzy. "Go" is the stage in which you must expel the "it" which no longer serves you. It's a level of self-realization and awareness reached only when you are prepared to depart from your ego and all of it's grand delusions, used to keep you attached to the corporeal realms of knowledge. It's saying goodbye, and yet, it's somehow saying hello.

        Put back together, these simple words (for me) became much like a stained-glass window through which I saw the elucidated image in its entirety and, simultaneously, could marvel at the individual beauty of its segments. The mantra, as a whole, served me in ways I never saw coming and could never capably explain. Through this verbose and windy anecdote, I hope I've been able to convey the importance of Daniel's oft-mentioned, "Let it go." This knowing apothegm, a blithe battle cry, has come to my rescue as a weapon against the threat of my own ego. Though never stomped out, this demon (of the "britches" variety, and not) can at least be bated down by the breathing in and out of those three little words. 
       And, most importantly, of course, "let it go" can definitely still be used as the most sure-fire way of taking someone from "shit-ass happy" to sullenly scorned during a heated group chat. 



17 comments:

  1. Wow. I knew you were going to go into this, but I had no idea how deep. I adore the post and feel like a douche at the same time; partly because that phrase I really only tried out for a couple days before it so fervently pissed off my friends that it became a joke, cliche, stereotype, and then piece of nostalgia all in a 48 hour cycle - such is the internet and el moderno worldo nowadays, and partly because I myself have a very difficult time letting things go. I often consider myself a "carrier" so to speak, for all the - anyone who knows me will confirm this with a smirk - physical things I carry with me just about all the time as well as the metaphysical things that linger in my head long after others have moved on in topic, in life, and consciousness. So perhaps I say it and try to evoke it on the surface as a way to reinforce it on myself as much as if not more than the people I'm telling on the outside.

    I think it's interesting that it really is one of the most annoying and fire-starting things to say to someone, when the phrase in itself is such a peaceful and liberating force that should actually be calming and fulfilling in its catharsis. I guess that's the kind of western reaction to an eastern concept. How dare you take such a responsibility for my troubles to tell me to simply forget about them?! I think that's a big part of it is how, on the surface, it feels so invasive and dismissive for someone else to tell YOU what to do with what's irking you. Then again, I wonder what the eastern take on someone telling someone else to let it go versus someone telling the self to let it go. It seems like it should come from within, something you can only let go on your own - kind of how when you repeated it to yourself, Bethany, it eventually changed from being my "phrase" to becoming your sincere words.

    This also brings me to a thought I had whilst tripping in the magical world of Edward's house, which I will leave for a post to fully go into.

    But thank you for posting this; loved reading it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. also, that drawing is fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. and is the song. as all ye garden state soundtrack disciples out there know.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't feel like a douche, please-- the story behind it somehow makes it even better for me. I like that it was spurred out of irony and culminated over a 48 hr period of time. I also am happy to hear that you're at odds with your own advice; that means you're really attempting to reflect.

    Also, I'm in complete agreeance, yet again, in terms of your East vs. West commentary... Enlightenment is something one must surely come to on their own, which is the purpose of meditative practices, fasting, and chanting in general. Though, in this case, I feel I needed to hear the words "let it go" from someone else, if that makes sense. It reminds me of a short book I once read called "101 Zen Stories" (which I'm now recommending that everyone reads because you can view it free online).... this was my very favorite tale:

    The Moon Cannot Be Stolen

    Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing in it to steal.

    Ryokan returned and caught him. "You may have come a long way to visit me," he told the prowler, "and you shoud not return emptyhanded. Please take my clothes as a gift."

    The thief was bewildered. He took the clothes and slunk away.

    Ryokan sat naked, watching the moon. "Poor fellow, " he mused, "I wish I could give him this beautiful moon."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also, glad you liked the image and the song-- it seemed fitting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I haven't read this or listened to the song yet. But Garden State soundtrack? I'm going to go for a second and slit my wrists. Brb

    ReplyDelete
  7. Also Daniel has only been saying this for like 3 weeks

    ReplyDelete
  8. Haha, firstly, thank you, Edward... I was actually unaware that this was in Garden State until today. I chose it based only on the lyrics. So, in other words, STFU.

    Matt, who cares that he's only been saying it for 3 weeks? I mean, just let it go...

    ReplyDelete
  9. And, in all honesty, this post was really much less about Daniel than it was about my own neurotic need to get into the semantics of a chant. Pretty self-serving, to say the least. I just wanted to give him some credit, whilst simultaneously tying in the topic of the month.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought Daniel had been saying this longer than three weeks? And in the situation I see others put him in sometimes, it makes sense for him to say it. Has it ever actually really pissed anyone off? Because it's Daniel and he's the most non-aggressive person, so it doesn't come across as annoying. To stretch his patience means you really SHOULD let things go.

    But I agree with Daniel here. The reason it's annoying (and hilarious as fuck) is because it's someone telling someone else to let their feelings go, because it's pissing him off. But when used as a mantra, it's very healing and truthful. Does any good come from holding onto something--anything--in life? I'm not so sure. It makes me wonder what the relevance and consequences are of human love in this world.

    I think that at their core Western and Easter religions/philosophies are essentially the same: surrender yourself to something greater, something that encompasses those around you and everything we live in. Now these are obviously different in practice, but I don't see much of a difference between surrendering yourself to Yahweh/Allah than to surrendering yourself to the infinite, like in Buddhism. There is a lot more shared in common between the spirituality of the East and the West than is commonly admitted, because our human examples of these religions have veered in such a sharp divergence. I think there is something to gain from spirituality all over the world, and not a huge amount to gain by limiting yourself to one dogma. (On the other hand, someone who really believes in a particular philosophy and devotes their life to it--aren't they doing more than someone who is well-read in all of the world's religions but still cannot live a "good life"?)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, and the song actually isn't bad. =P

    ReplyDelete
  12. God, I really live for comments like this, and I'm not ashamed to admit that. It really is so very funny only because Daniel is a naturally non-aggressive person. That's the beauty in it, really. Yet, I'm still feeling the narcissistic need to reiterate that this post is only vaguely related to Daniel.

    I'm also glad you bring up the concept of human love in regards to earthly attachments... it's something I've considered before, and it's probably the hardest desire to part from when attempting to release yourself from wanting. Some would argue that love, as a concept, is derived from a place of non-wanting so it escapes the rule of attachment... I'm not sure how I feel about this, obviously.

    Also, I do, in fact, agree with what you're saying with regards to the underlying symbolism of all organized religions-- the common thread throughout each is too clear to deny. Though, with respect to what Daniel was saying earlier, I feel he was speaking more of cultural/philosophical traditions and viewpoints rather than actual religious tenets... and, in that case, there are many dissimilarities to be found.

    In the end, though, I would choose a "good life" over anything, every time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. On second thought, I would say I see a very strong case for human love: having a family and raising children. As much as we may have aversions to it and question the point of reproducing itself because it seems like an endless process that ultimately leads nowhere except the same cycle, we wouldn't be here without it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Who is the "we" in that statement? I certainly do not agree with the latter sentiment, there.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Haha. Oh.... (Alone Again Naturally)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hahah, Jesus. I'm just sayin' I love me some babies, that's all. So yes, I actually do see a point in human love... (even when I'm single as fuck and have "Never Gonna Fall in Love Again" on repeat).

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.